Workflow and context
Map the real task, source information, permissions and the human decision the AI should support.
AI integration
We integrate language and voice models into products and operations where they can remove work or improve a decision. The model is one component. Context, evaluation, cost and human control make the feature dependable enough to use.
Discuss your AI workflowA good fit
We start with one workflow and define what a useful answer, a wrong answer and a safe fallback look like.
Map the real task, source information, permissions and the human decision the AI should support.
Route work to open-source or frontier models according to volume, quality needs and budget.
Test representative cases, record weak patterns and define what happens when confidence or evidence is insufficient.
Return structured results, connect approved actions and make escalation visible to the people responsible.
A narrow workflow gives the team something real to evaluate instead of a general chatbot promise.
Useful examples include normal requests, unclear inputs and the cases where a wrong answer matters.
Add cost limits, source context, structured output, logging and human escalation where needed.
Measure usefulness, corrections, failure patterns and cost before expanding the automation.
Related work
Client work and company-owned products are labeled separately because both show capability but they are not the same kind of endorsement.
A separate AI processing module uses lower-cost open-source models for large summary batches and a frontier model for the final Romanian report and structured product output.
Client voice agents use company-specific information and Retell AI phone flows. FitProgress, a company-owned app, creates personalized workout plans from its exercise library.
AI output can be fluent and still be wrong. The workflow must decide what the model may suggest, what it may do and what needs a person.
The workflow decides. We compare quality, latency, privacy needs, volume and cost, and can combine open-source and frontier models when that is useful.
We use representative examples and explicit acceptance criteria for the task. Evaluation includes unclear input and important failure cases, not only the happy path.
Only where the business has defined approved actions and safeguards. Higher-risk or unclear cases should be escalated to a person.
Yes. The AI layer can return structured results or call approved application functions, depending on the current architecture and permissions.
We measure usage by workflow, choose an appropriate model for each step, batch work where sensible and keep limits visible.
Tell us what people do today, what information they use and what a useful result would change.
Discuss your AI workflow