Requirements and scope
Clarify the users, business rules, integrations, constraints and smallest useful release.
Custom software development
We turn a business requirement into a working SaaS, FinTech or operational product. Aurel “Simi” Simion leads the architecture and works directly on implementation, with collaborators added when the scope needs more capacity.
Discuss your productA good fit
The exact scope depends on the product and the team already in place. Typical work covers:
Clarify the users, business rules, integrations, constraints and smallest useful release.
Choose a structure that matches the expected load, operating budget and the team that will maintain it.
Build the agreed product, test the important paths and prepare a controlled release.
Document decisions, transfer practical knowledge and agree whether ongoing architecture or delivery support is useful.
We start with what the product must achieve, not a preferred technology list.
We identify assumptions, dependencies and the smallest release that can create useful evidence.
Working increments make decisions easier to inspect before more time and budget are committed.
Production behaviour informs the next priorities, support needs and sensible improvements.
Related work
These examples show operating scale and the type of decisions involved. Platform numbers describe the systems, not a promise that every new product will reach the same volume.
Architecture and hands-on implementation for a payment platform connecting more than 50 payment methods across 18 countries.
A financial verification and reporting product designed around large company datasets, frequent checks and understandable risk information.
A useful proposal should say what is known, what still needs discovery and what evidence will change the plan.
Yes. Simi can lead architecture and selected implementation work while your team owns other parts. Responsibilities are made explicit during scoping.
We document the business goal, included work, assumptions, dependencies and decision points. Unknowns that need discovery are identified before they become silent promises.
Ownership and any third-party licensing are defined in the project agreement. The technical handover is planned alongside delivery rather than left until the final week.
When useful, ongoing delivery or architecture support can be scoped separately. Some teams need a handover, while others want continued senior involvement.
No. Technology follows the product constraints, existing team, integrations, operating cost and expected life of the system.
A short first conversation is enough to establish the product, current evidence and the next sensible step.
Discuss your product